Helicopter versus GROUND emergency medical services in mountainous trauma care: a comparative cohort study on time efficiency, golden hour achievement, and clinical outcomes in the Qinba region.
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · 2026-03-30 · Observational study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the time efficiency and clinical outcomes of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) versus ground emergency medical services (GROUND) for severe trauma in the mountainous Qinba region, with a focus on achieving the "golden hour" and its impact on patient prognosis. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included severe trauma patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥ 16) transported by HEMS or GROUND between January 2018 and September 2025. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed using age, sex, APACHE II, and ISS scores to control for confounding. The primary outcome was a composite of major in-hospital complications. "Golden hour" compliance was defined as completion of critical imaging (FAST/CT) and admission to the operating room or intensive care unit within 60 min of the emergency call. Time metrics, mortality, organ dysfunction (SOFA), length of stay, and discharge neurological status (GOS) were compared. RESULTS: After matching, 77 well-balanced pairs were formed. HEMS achieved a significantly higher golden hour compliance rate than GROUND (71.43% vs. 2.60%, p < 0.001). HEMS significantly reduced transport time (median 15 vs. 105 min, p < 0.001) and total call-to-hospital arrival time (46 vs. 158 min, p < 0.001). Clinically, HEMS was associated with lower 24-h mortality (1.30% vs. 10.39%, p = 0.039), lower composite major complication rate (7.88% vs. 26.33%, p = 0.026), lower SOFA scores (median 12 vs. 20, p < 0.001), shorter ICU (5.62 vs. 9.78 days, p < 0.001) and hospital stays (13.44 vs. 21.34 days, p < 0.001), and higher GOS scores at discharge (4.0 vs. 2.64, p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression identified HEMS as an independent protective factor for better outcomes. ROC analysis showed perfect discrimination of HEMS vs. GROUND by transport time and total arrival time (AUC = 1.000). CONCLUSION: In mountainous regions, HEMS markedly improves golden hour attainment, translating into reduced early mortality, fewer complications, milder organ dysfunction, shorter hospitalizations, and better neurological recovery. These findings support the integration of HEMS into trauma systems in geographically challenging areas.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Helicopter & air ambulance · Mortality & survival · Rural & remote · Time intervals
Related articles
- Physician staffed helicopter emergency medical systems can provide advanced trauma life support in mountainous and remote areas. (Injury, 2017)
- Analysing geospatial variables in the context of trauma networks: A scoping review. (Injury, 2026)
- How many minutes matter: Association between time saved with air medical transport and survival in trauma patients. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2025)
- Retrospective Review of Major Trauma Patterns and Outcomes in Remote Queensland. (ANZ J Surg, 2026)
- Outcomes of pediatric trauma patients transported from rural and urban scenes. (Air Med J, 2008)
- A comparison of metropolitan vs rural major trauma in Western Australia. (Resuscitation, 2011)