Reporting of Utstein-recommended variables in prehospital traumatic cardiac arrest: a scoping review.
BMC Emergency Medicine · 2026-05-18 · Scoping review
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) is a time-critical emergency with substantial heterogeneity across prehospital systems. Standardized reporting using Utstein-recommended variables is essential to enable valid comparison and synthesis across studies. To map how prehospital TCA studies published between 2020 and 2025 report Utstein-recommended variables, assess adherence to core and supplementary elements, and identify gaps and variation in reporting practice. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and reported according to PRISMA-ScR. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for English-language primary studies. Utstein-recommended variables were charted using a prespecified codebook and mapped to Utstein core and supplementary elements. Reporting completeness was summarized descriptively, and study-level reporting patterns were visualized using a heatmap and an UpSet plot. RESULTS: Fifty studies were included. Core elements were more consistently reported than supplementary elements (≥50% reported in 72.0% vs 12.0% of studies). Demographics and arrest etiology were almost universally reported (98-100%), whereas time-interval and dispatch-related variables were rarely reported, including time to first shock (0%), dispatch time variables (4.0%), and time to first CPR (2.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Reporting of Utstein-recommended variables in contemporary prehospital TCA studies is incomplete and uneven, with persistent underreporting of dispatch- and time-interval elements and limited co-reporting of key core variables required for comparability. Improved adherence to a minimum Utstein-aligned dataset, augmented by trauma-specific descriptors, may strengthen standardization and interpretability of the TCA evidence base. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Research methods & trial conduct
Related articles
- Accuracy of etiological classification of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A scoping review. (Resuscitation, 2024)
- Cardiac arrest: an interdisciplinary scoping review of clinical literature from 2021 (Frontiers in Emergency Medicine, 2023)
- Clinical Predictive Models of Sudden Cardiac Arrest: A Survey of the Current Science and Analysis of Model Performances. (J Am Heart Assoc, 2020)
- Cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death registries: a systematic review of global coverage. (Open Heart, 2020)
- Essential features of designating out-of-hospital cardiac arrest as a reportable event: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; and Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. (Circulation, 2008)
- Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update and simplification of the Utstein templates for resuscitation registries. A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the international liaison committee on resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa). (Resuscitation, 2004)