The FaciLItated hospital-based ECPR via Helicopter Transport (FLIGHT-to-ECPR) study.
Resuscitation · 2026-05-20 · Observational study
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains poor, particularly for refractory ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT). Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) improves outcomes when delivered within 60 min of low-flow time, although geographic constraints frequently extend this interval in rural settings. RESEARCH QUESTION/HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that a Helicopter-EMS (HEMS)-facilitated, hospital-based ECPR pathway could expand rural access while preserving clinical outcomes comparable to standard ground-transport ECPR. METHODS: The FaciLItated hospital-based ECPR via Helicopter Transport (FLIGHT-to-ECPR) Study is a single-center prospective observational cohort study (August 2021-December 2025). Adults (18-75 years) with refractory VF/VT OHCA meeting Minnesota Mobile Resuscitation Consortium eligibility criteria were included. The pathway used parallel EMS and Helicopter-EMS activation with intra-arrest mechanical-CPR transport to a hospital-based ECMO center. Outcomes were compared 1:1 with a matched cohort treated under the standard ground-transport ECPR protocol, matched on low-flow time. The primary outcome was survival to discharge with favorable neurologic status (CPC 1-2). RESULTS: Forty-five patients underwent FLIGHT activation; 27 (60%) received ECPR (veno-arterial ECMO during cardiac arrest). Mean age was 55.2 ± 15.0 years; 83.7% were witnessed arrests and 69.0% received bystander CPR. Mean 9-1-1-to-hospital arrival time was 70.3 ± 18.5 min; HEMS scene and flight times were 18.0 ± 11.6 and 18.6 ± 6.3 min, respectively. Among cannulated patients, low-flow time was 85.9 ± 29.3 min. Overall favorable neurologic survival (CPC 1-2) was 33.3% (15/45): 25.9% (7/27) in cannulated patients and 44.4% (8/18) in non-cannulated patients achieving ROSC or meeting termination criteria. In matched ECPR patients (n = 27/group), low-flow times were similar (85.9 ± 29.3 vs. 87.1 ± 29.2 min; p ≥ 0.99), with identical favorable neurologic survival (25.9%; p ≥ 0.99). No differences were observed in cannulation performance, ECMO duration, or hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: A HEMS-facilitated, hospital-based ECPR strategy is feasible and safely expands rural access to advanced resuscitation while preserving neurologic outcomes comparable to standard ground-transport ECPR. Geography alone need not preclude ECPR when systems are optimized to maintain timely reperfusion.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Helicopter & air ambulance · ECMO & mechanical circulatory support · Mechanical CPR · Mortality & survival · Quality of life & function · Rural & remote · Time intervals
Related articles
- Refractory cardiac arrest in a rural area: mechanical chest compression during helicopter transport. (Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2013)
- Implementation of a regional extracorporeal membrane oxygenation program for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: results of the prospective observational study. (Resusc Plus, 2026)
- Effect of Intra-arrest Transport, Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, and Immediate Invasive Assessment and Treatment on Functional Neurologic Outcome in Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial. (JAMA, 2022)
- A randomized trial of expedited intra-arrest transfer versus more extended on-scene resuscitation for refractory out of hospital cardiac arrest: Rationale and design of the EVIDENCE trial. (Am Heart J, 2024)
- Establishment of an extracorporeal cardio-pulmonary resuscitation program in Berlin - outcomes of 254 patients with refractory circulatory arrest. (Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2020)
- Intraarrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and early invasive management in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an individual patient data pooled analysis of two randomised trials. (EClinicalMedicine, 2023)