Prehospital
Literature Index
Airway & ventilation

Etomidate Versus Ketamine for Emergency Intubation in Critically Ill Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Vítor H Andriazzi, Renato P Curcio, Michael A R A Novais, Bernardo L G Fernandes, Giovana C Rosa, Juan G S Vasconcelos, Juliano N Quineper

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine · 2026-06-16 · Meta-analysis

Read at publisher · PubMed

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of etomidate versus ketamine as induction agents for rapid sequence intubation in critically ill adults, focusing on 28-day mortality and post-intubation hypotension.Data SourcesPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to January 2026. Reference lists of included studies were also manually screened.Study SelectionWe included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing single-dose intravenous ketamine versus etomidate for emergency rapid sequence intubation in critically ill adults (≥ 18 years) in non-operating room settings (eg, intensive care unit or emergency department).Data ExtractionTwo investigators independently screened records, extracted data using a standardized form and assessed the risk of bias using the RoB 2 tool. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework.Data SynthesisSix RCTs comprising 4108 randomized patients (2046 assigned to ketamine and 2062 to etomidate) were included. For the primary outcome, the pooled analysis evaluated 4102 patients and showed no statistically significant difference in 28-day mortality between the ketamine and etomidate groups (28.7% vs 29.9%; relative risk [RR] 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87-1.05; I2 = 13.8%). In a prespecified subgroup analysis of patients with sepsis (n = 1546), mortality also did not differ significantly (RR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.91-1.19). However, ketamine was associated with a statistically significant increase in the incidence of post-intubation hypotension (14.2% vs 11.3%; RR 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.53; I2 = 0%). Conversely, ketamine significantly reduced the risk of adrenal suppression compared to etomidate (5.3% vs 14.7%; RR 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.75). No significant differences were observed regarding peri-intubation cardiac arrest or first-attempt intubation success.ConclusionsFor emergency intubation in critically ill adults, including those with sepsis, 28-day mortality is similar between etomidate and ketamine. However, ketamine may increase post-intubation hypotension, whereas etomidate may increase adrenal suppression.

Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal

Tags

Anaesthetics · Etomidate · Ketamine · Rapid sequence intubation

Related articles