Ketamine Versus Propofol for Sedation in Acute Psychiatric Emergencies During Aeromedical Retrieval: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Prehospital Emergency Care · 2026-06-17 · Randomised trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of psychiatric disease is increasing globally. Regional Australian communities are disproportionately affected and uniquely lacking mental health resources. Those needing inpatient psychiatric care often require aeromedical retrieval, creating safety and operational challenges. The optimal medication regimen for sedation of non-intubated patients experiencing psychiatric agitation is unclear. METHODS: We performed a prospective, single-center, open-label, phase IV randomized clinical trial (RCT) of ketamine versus propofol for the sedation of acutely agitated patients undergoing aeromedical transport. Our primary outcome of interest was a composite adverse event endpoint including airway complications (need for adjuncts, manipulation, suctioning), breathing complications (hypoxemia, hypoventilation, need for bag-valve-mask ventilation or stimulation), circulatory compromise (hypotension, need for intravenous fluid bolus), and aspiration. We evaluated clinician satisfaction as a secondary outcome, and medication efficacy as an exploratory analysis. RESULTS: Of 1,078 referrals screened for inclusion, 170 were enrolled after requiring sedation - 52% randomized to receive propofol and 48% ketamine. Most patients were young (median age 30 years), First Nations (75.9%), male (66.5%), and diagnosed with psychosis (82.4%). Adverse events were more common in the propofol group (12.4% vs. 24.7%; RR = 0.50, 95% CI (0.25-0.99); x2(1) = 4.25, p = 0.039), yet clinicians preferred propofol to ketamine (median Likert rating 4 (IQR 4,5) vs. 4 (IQR 2,4), p = 0.0007). Both medications exhibited similar efficacy at reaching the target Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score (OR 0.73 (95%CI 0.50-1.07)). The study stopped early due to low enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: In this RCT of 170 patients, ketamine was associated with fewer adverse events compared to propofol when used for sedation during aeromedical retrieval of patients experiencing acute psychiatric agitation. There was no significant difference in achieving the goal RASS between the two agents, however clinicians reported higher satisfaction scores with propofol.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Bag-valve-mask ventilation · Suction · Anaesthetics · Ketamine · Helicopter & air ambulance · Propofol
Related articles
- In-Flight Pharmacological Management of Patients with Acute Mental Health Disturbance. (Air Med J, 2018)
- Risk of complications using a sedation protocol for aeromedical retrieval of acutely unwell mental health patients: a retrospective cohort study in Outback Australia. (Emerg Med J, 2025)
- Impact of a ketamine sedation protocol on intubation rates and undesirable outcomes in the transport of patients with acute behavioural disturbance. (Emerg Med Australas, 2020)
- Ketamine Sedation for Patients With Acute Behavioral Disturbance During Aeromedical Retrieval: A Retrospective Chart Review. (Air Med J, 2017)
- A Ketamine Protocol and Intubation Rates for Psychiatric Air Medical Retrieval. (Air Med J, 2015)
- Air medical retrieval of acute psychiatric patients. (Air Med J, 2014)