Noninvasive ventilation versus oxygen mask for preoxygenation before emergency tracheal intubation in critically ill adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Medicina intensiva · 2026-07-14 · Meta-analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) versus standard oxygen mask for preoxygenation before emergency intubation in critically ill adults. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials following PRISMA 2020. Protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251028685). Risk ratios (RR) were calculated using random-effects models with HKSJ adjustment. Certainty assessed using GRADE. SETTING: Intensive care units and emergency departments. Only in-hospital settings were included. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: 1619 critically ill adults requiring emergency intubation from four RCTs (802 NIV, 817 standard mask). Mean age ranged from 55 to 65 years across trials; 79% enrolled in ICUs, 21% in EDs. INTERVENTIONS: Preoxygenation with NIV (CPAP or bilevel positive airway pressure) versus standard passive facemask oxygenation without positive pressure. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Primary outcome: peri-intubation hypoxemia (SpO₂ < 80%). Safety outcome: aspiration or regurgitation. RESULTS: Peri-intubation hypoxemia occurred in 63/802 (7.9%) with NIV versus 144/817 (17.6%) with mask (RR 0.39; 95% CI 0.14-1.04; p = 0.08; I² = 55%). The point estimate favored NIV, but the confidence interval crossed unity under the HKSJ-adjusted model. Three of four trials individually showed significant reductions. Aspiration was infrequent (1.0% vs 1.7%; p = 0.31). Certainty was moderate for hypoxemia and low for safety. CONCLUSIONS: Preoxygenation with NIV did not significantly reduce peri-intubation hypoxemia compared with a standard oxygen mask under the HKSJ-adjusted model. Nonetheless, the pooled point estimate favored NIV and three of the four trials showed significant reductions, suggesting a possible benefit that did not reach statistical significance. No increases in adverse events were observed. The decision to use NIV should be individualized according to clinical context, patient profile, and team experience.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
CPAP & NIV · Other drugs · Oxygen
Related articles
- Noninvasive respiratory support for preoxygenation in emergency intubation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. (ERJ Open Res, 2025)
- Preoxygenation strategies for intubation of patients who are critically ill: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials. (Lancet Respir Med, 2025)
- Respiratory support techniques to avoid desaturation in critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (J Crit Care, 2017)
- High flow nasal cannula for preoxygenation in rapid sequence intubation: a narrative review (Signa Vitae, 2025)
- Apnoeic oxygenation via high-flow nasal cannula oxygen combined with non-invasive ventilation preoxygenation for intubation in hypoxaemic patients in the intensive care unit: the single-centre, blinded, randomised controlled OPTINIV trial. (Intensive Care Med, 2016)
- Prehospital airway and ventilatory management: a collaborative and narrative review. (Intensive Care Med, 2026)