Enhancing the golden hour: classification of traumatic brain injury, severity, and concomitant clinical phenotypes using prehospital continuous physiological data during air transport.
Physiological Measurement · 2026-08-03 · Method & validation
Abstract
Background.During emergency transport, clinical assessment and vital signs (VS) may lack the sensitivity to identify traumatic brain injury (TBI) and identify specific TBI subtypes which may have implications for triaging and timely delivery of life-saving interventions.Objective.To evaluate the ability of machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify the presence of TBI with or without specific important concomitant clinical phenotypes including shock, coagulopathy and polytrauma during air transport to a trauma center.Methods.We identified a cohort of consecutive trauma patients aged 18-65 transported from the scene of injury via helicopter to an urban academic trauma center and collected prehospital clinical data and continuous VSs. We used ElasticNet (regularized regression) and XGBoost (gradient boosting), comparing three variable sets: clinical variables only, continuous physiologic monitoring data only, and combined clinical and physiological data, to develop four predictive models: (1) presence/absence of TBI, (2) mild vs moderate-severe TBI, (3) presence/absence of polytrauma in moderate-severe TBI, (4) presence/absence of coagulopathy in TBI, and (5) presence/absence of shock in TBI.Results.1025 patients (median age 38, interquartile range (IQR): 27-53; 70% male; median Glasgow coma scale 15 (IQR: 13-15) were identified. Across all predictive models, ML algorithms exhibited good predictive discrimination, with area under the receiver operator curve of 0.79 (0.75-0.84), 0.79 (0.74-0.83), 0.89 (0.85-0.92), 0.77 (0.67-0.86), and 0.78 (0.72-0.84) for TBI, TBI severity, polytrauma, coagulopathy, and shock, respectively. Clinical data best predicted TBI severity and polytrauma, while physiologic data improved prediction of shock and coagulopathy.Conclusions.ML algorithms integrating clinical and continuous physiological monitoring can improve identification of TBI and concomitant clinical phenotypes during prehospital transport.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Helicopter & air ambulance · Early warning scores · Mortality & survival · Urban
Related articles
- Evaluation of the discriminative performance of the prehospital National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics score regarding 48-h mortality. (Eur J Emerg Med, 2019)
- A Machine Learning Trauma Triage Model for Critical Care Transport. (JAMA Netw Open, 2025)
- Improving the prediction of mortality and the need for life-saving interventions in trauma patients using standard vital signs with heart-rate variability and complexity. (Shock, 2015)
- Do pre-hospital anaesthesiologists reliably predict mortality using the NACA severity score? A retrospective cohort study. (Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2013)
- Prehospital quick sequential organ failure assessment as a tool to predict in-hospital mortality. (Am J Emerg Med, 2018)
- Effect of Glycemia and Diabetes on Early Warning Scores Performance in Prehospital Patients With Acute Illness: Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study. (Mayo Clin Proc, 2026)