Antivenom efficacy and traditional practices for Snakebite in Brazil: Where do they meet?

Toxicon · 2026-08-17 · Other / unclear

Abstract

Snakebite envenoming (SBE) remains a significant public health issue in Brazil, where venom diversity, barriers to timely healthcare, and widespread ethnomedical practices intersect. Venom variability across medically relevant snake species poses important challenges for antivenom design and antigenic coverage in the country. In this context, this integrative review examines how venom diversity, antivenom efficacy and protective coverage, and traditional first aid and pre-hospital practices influence the management of snakebite envenoming. Preclinical studies revealed substantial inter- and intraspecific variation in the venoms of Bothrops, Crotalus, Lachesis, and Micrurus species, resulting in heterogeneous venom compositions and biological activities, including lethality that may affect antigenic recognition and neutralization. Although Brazilian antivenoms generally neutralize major toxic activities and reverse life-threatening systemic manifestations of envenoming, there are important limitations in their protective capacity against well-established severe complications such as local tissue damage and neurological syndromes. These limitations are highlighted by the incomplete representation of regional venom diversity in immunization pools and differential toxin immunorecognition. Delayed access to antivenom further worsens clinical outcomes, particularly in remote areas. Concurrently, medicinal plants and first aid and pre-hospital practices were widely used despite limited scientific validation and, in some cases, potential iatrogenic risks to human health. Overall, the available evidence indicates that effective snakebite management in Brazil requires addressing the combined challenges posed by venom variability and current antivenom programs, optimizing antivenom design and coverage, expanding equitable access to healthcare, promoting evidence-based community education, encouraging rigorous scientific evaluation of safe complementary practices.