Public Acceptance, Trust, and Self-Efficacy Related to Drone-Assisted Emergency Medical Response in Louisiana.
Prehospital Emergency Care · 2026-09-14 · Observational study
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Drones can deliver automated external defibrillators and other emergency supplies to bystanders before an ambulance arrives, but their public-health value depends on whether the public accepts, trusts, and feels able to use them. This study examined public acceptance of drone-assisted emergency medical response in Louisiana, including trust in drone systems and self-efficacy for using drone-delivered medical supplies, and identified demographic, experiential, and attitudinal predictors of acceptance, trust, and self-efficacy among Louisiana adults. METHODS: Cross-sectional, observational online survey of 586 Louisiana adults recruited through the Dynata panel and administered via the Research Electronic Data Capture platform. Participants reviewed a standardized educational sequence describing a drone-assisted emergency response scenario before completing validated composite measures of acceptance, trust, and self-efficacy (Cronbach's alpha = .89-.91). Descriptive statistics, independent-samples t tests, paired-samples t tests, one-way analyses of variance, Pearson correlations, hierarchical multiple regression, and thematic analysis of open-ended responses were conducted. RESULTS: Overall attitudes were favorable: mean acceptance 4.1 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.0), trust 3.8 (SD = 1.0), and self-efficacy 4.0 (SD = 0.9). Trust and self-efficacy were the strongest predictors of acceptance (R² = .57), and trust was the strongest predictor of self-efficacy, indicating that modifiable attitudinal factors, rather than fixed demographic characteristics, drive adoption. Telecommunicator guidance increased self-efficacy versus independent action for both family members and strangers (Cohen's d = 0.41-0.44, p < .001), with no difference by recipient type. Younger and Black or African American respondents reported lower acceptance and self-efficacy. Concerns centered on reliability, navigation accuracy, and user competency; confidence was associated with demonstrated reliability, normalization, telecommunicator support, and training. CONCLUSIONS: Public acceptance is driven primarily by trust and self-efficacy, modifiable factors amenable to targeted implementation. Programs emphasizing operational reliability, telecommunicator integration, public education, and clear user guidance may accelerate adoption. These findings suggest that equity-focused outreach by emergency medical services agencies and public health partners, particularly toward younger adults and Black or African American respondents, who reported lower acceptance and self-efficacy, may help narrow demographic gaps in the public's readiness to use drone-assisted emergency response.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Automated external defibrillator · Communication & handover · Drones · Equity & disparities
Related articles
- The use of drone-delivered Automated External Defibrillators in the emergency response for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A simulation study. (Resusc Plus, 2025)
- Bystanders' attitudes towards drone delivered Automated External Defibrillators for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A qualitative interview study. (PLoS One, 2025)
- Public-private partnerships for UAV-assisted emergency medical services in aging communities: an evolutionary game approach. (Front Public Health, 2026)
- From prediction to precision: Artificial intelligence and emerging technologies in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. (Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 2025)
- Rural-urban differences for integrated first responder and drone automated external defibrillator delivery in North Carolina. (Am Heart J, 2026)
- The Case for Drone-assisted Emergency Response to Cardiac Arrest: An Optimized Statewide Deployment Approach. (N C Med J, 2019)