Comparing Respiratory Support Modalities in Pediatric Asthma Exacerbation-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pediatric Reports · 2026-08-04 · Meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: To compare clinical outcomes and racial disparities of children hospitalized for acute asthma exacerbation who required any respiratory support: invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), non-invasive modalities (non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC)). Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies published between 2010 and 2025 that involved pediatric asthma patients (0-18 years) who received HFNC, NIV, or IMV. Network meta-analyses (NMA) were conducted separately for RCTs (change in asthma score) and observational studies (PICU length of stay). Subgroup analyses compared respiratory support modalities and failure rates. Racial and ethnic disparities were analyzed narratively. Results: In five RCTs (n = 233), compared to oxygen, HFNC showed no significant benefit (MD = 0.24; p = 0.58), whereas NIV showed the greatest improvement in asthma scores (mean difference [MD] = 1.24; p = 0.07), reaching significance in sensitivity analysis (MD = 2.5; p < 0.001). Observational NMA found no differences in PICU stay between respiratory support modalities, but HFNC was associated with 2-fold increase in PICU stay in a subgroup analysis compared to standard oxygen (p = 0.04) and with a higher failure rate compared to NIV (12.6% vs. 2.6%; OR = 5.3, p < 0.001). Black children had higher odds of intubation. Conclusions: Available evidence suggests that NIV may confer greater short-term clinical benefit in children with severe acute asthma requiring respiratory support, although findings should be interpreted cautiously given the limited and heterogeneous data. Further high-quality studies with standardized outcomes are needed to inform respiratory support selection.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Children · CPAP & NIV · Equity & disparities · High-flow nasal oxygen · Mechanical ventilation
Related articles
- Efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula versus continuous positive airway pressure and conventional oxygen therapies in pediatric acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (BMC Pediatr, 2026)
- Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2023)
- Respiratory support during neonatal and infant aeromedical interfacility transfers in the Western Cape, South Africa: a retrospective review. (BMC Emerg Med, 2025)
- Noninvasive Respiratory Support during Pediatric Critical Care Transport: A Retrospective Cohort Study. (J Pediatr Intensive Care, 2024)
- Implementation of High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Noninvasive Ventilation During Pediatric Interfacility Transport: Effect on Intubation Rates. (Air Med J, 2026)
- [Invasive mechanical ventilation: indications and alternatives : Systematic evaluation of the evidence and recommendations for clinical practice from the S3 guidelines "invasive mechanical ventilation and the use of extracorporeal procedures in acute respiratory failure"]. (Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed, 2026)