Feasibility and acceptability of pediatric expert teleconsultation during critical ambulance transports: a pilot randomized controlled simulation trial.
Resuscitation Plus · 2026-08-14 · Randomised trial
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Before a trial testing prehospital teleconsultation for children, we studied acceptability, feasibility, and workload after integrating teleconsultation into Emergency Medical Service (EMS) workflows. METHODS: We randomized paramedic-physician teams to teleconsultation (audio/video call, intervention) or usual care (audio call, control) for three simulated pediatric transports using mixed methods. Paramedic dyads provided in-ambulance simulated care while remote pediatric emergency physicians offered real-time consultation. In the intervention group, we used the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire to measure acceptability [primary; Total Usability Score (TUS), maximum = 7] and feasibility [secondary; Interaction Quality Score (IQS)]; and interviews for Technology Acceptance Model themes. Between groups, we calculated descriptive statistics and compared connection success and workload. RESULTS: Twenty-four teams (12/group) completed 72 simulated transports. Intervention paramedics attempted physician contact in 94% (34/36) of transports versus 47% (17/36) in control; 92% connected in ≤2 attempts. In the intervention group, mean TUS was 5.6 (95% CI 5.2, 6.0) for physicians and 5.8 (95% CI 5.5, 6.0) for paramedics; mean IQS was 5.2 (95% CI 4.6, 6.0) and 5.9 (95% CI 5.4, 6.3) respectively. Intervention paramedics reported similar workload to controls (p = 0.26) but less frustration (p = 0.03); physicians experienced higher workload (p = 0.01). Interviews identified improved communication and physician involvement, alongside uncertainty about physician roles and impact on paramedic autonomy. Video quality was adequate, but concerns about real-world audio and broadband reliability remained. CONCLUSIONS: In simulations, teleconsultation for pediatric EMS transports was acceptable and feasible with minor technical modifications. Implementation should balance physician workload and clarify roles through training. Future trials should evaluate patient outcomes.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Children · Clinician perspective · Communication & handover · Paramedics & EMTs · Prehospital physicians · Telemedicine
Related articles
- Acceptability of ambulance-based telemedicine (ABT) for paediatric emergencies in Karachi, Pakistan. (BMJ Glob Health, 2026)
- Experiences from a cluster-randomized trial (ParaNASPP) exploring triage and diagnostic accuracy in paramedic-suspected stroke: a qualitative interview study. (Eur J Neurol, 2024)
- Pilot Paramedic Survey of Benefits, Risks, and Strategies for Pediatric Prehospital Telemedicine. (Pediatr Emerg Care, 2021)
- Technical feasibility and ambulance nurses' view of a digital telemedicine system in pre-hospital stroke care - A pilot study. (Int Emerg Nurs, 2019)
- A randomized, controlled, blinded evaluation of augmenting point-of-care ultrasound and remote telementored ultrasound in inexperienced operators. (Isr Med Assoc J, 2022)
- Comparing effects and application of telemedicine for different specialties in emergency medicine using the Emergency Talk Application (U-Sim ETA Trial). (Sci Rep, 2023)