Population-level association of layperson cardiopulmonary resuscitation training with survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Frontiers in Public Health · 2026-01-01 · Meta-analysis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a significant worldwide cause of death and is highly dependent upon bystander intervention. Layperson cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training has been widely promoted, but its population-level association with survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remains incompletely characterized. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. PubMed, Embase, Web of science and Cochrane Library and major Chinese database were searched from inception to June 1, 2026. Studies evaluating the association between layperson CPR training and OHCA survival outcomes were included. The main outcome measure was survival to hospital discharge. Random-effects models were used for calculation of pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). I2 statistics and Egger's / Begg's tests were used to evaluate heterogeneity and publication bias. RESULTS: Nineteen observational studies comprising 159,378 participants from eight countries were included in the systematic review. Seventeen studies comprising 144,775 participants contributed to the training-modality-specific meta-analyses. Layperson CPR training was associated with higher survival to hospital discharge. In the training-modality-specific analyses, favorable associations were observed for both CPR-only training (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.39-2.19) and CPR combined with AED training (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.15-1.77). There was evidence of significant heterogeneity among the studies, but no evidence of publication bias. CONCLUSION: Layperson CPR training was associated with higher population-level survival after OHCA and should be viewed as one component of an integrated community resuscitation system. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/record_view.phprecid=CRD420261479204.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Automated external defibrillator · Bystanders · Mortality & survival
Related articles
- 2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Part 2. Current status of cardiac arrest and the chain of survival. (Clin Exp Emerg Med, 2026)
- Part 4: Systems of Care: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. (Circulation, 2025)
- Mobile applications enhance out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (BMC Health Serv Res, 2025)
- The role of bystander CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: what the evidence tells us. (Hellenic J Cardiol, 2025)
- The American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care 2030 Impact Goals and Call to Action to Improve Cardiac Arrest Outcomes: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. (Circulation, 2024)
- Sociodemographic factors associated with paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review. (Resuscitation, 2023)