Machine learning versus conventional methods for prehospital detection of stroke due to large vessel occlusion or intracranial haemorrhage.
European Stroke Journal · 2026-09-05 · Method & validation
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Adequate prehospital triage of anterior-circulation LVO (aLVO) or ICH enables direct allocation to appropriate stroke centres. Traditional triage based on clinical scales or logistic regression may miss complex predictor interactions, whereas machine learning approaches may improve diagnostic accuracy. We compared 3 prehospital triage methods to detect a composite outcome of aLVO or ICH using internal-external cross-validation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed emergency medical services-activated stroke codes (2018-2019) from the Leiden Prehospital Stroke Study and the Prehospital Triage of Patients With Suspected Stroke Study. We compared XGBoost (supervised machine learning [sML]), conventional logistic regression (cLR) and the Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE) scale using 2-fold internal-external cross-validation. Two variable sets were evaluated: (1) routine prehospital variables (demographics, symptom duration, vital signs, glucose, neurological deficits) and (2) an extended set including medical history, anticoagulant use and point-of-care international normalised ratio. Discrimination and calibration were assessed using balanced accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Brier scores and calibration plots. RESULTS: Among 3320 patients, 538 (16%) had aLVO or ICH. Using routine variables, mean balanced accuracy was 82.1% for sML, 79.0% for cLR and 74.5% for RACE (P < .01). With extended variables, performance improved to 84.4% for sML and 80.7% for cLR (P < .01). The sML model achieved the highest sensitivity (76.7%) and specificity (92.1%). Calibration was good for both models, although Brier scores were lower for cLR. CONCLUSION: XGBoost showed modestly higher discriminative performance than cLR or RACE, while cLR showed better calibration. These findings suggest that machine learning may improve prehospital classification in selected settings, but the absolute gains were limited and require further external validation and prospective implementation studies.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Decision support tools · Triage instruments
Related articles
- Prehospital Detection of Large Vessel Occlusion and Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using a Dual-Biomarker Point-of-Care Test. (Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol, 2026)
- Validation of the Ultimate Stroke Scale (USS): A standardized tool for automated large vessel occlusion screening. (Interv Neuroradiol, 2025)
- Prehospital stroke-scale machine-learning model predicts the need for surgical intervention. (Sci Rep, 2023)
- Personalized Prehospital Triage in Acute Ischemic Stroke. (Stroke, 2019)
- Novel Prehospital Prediction Model of Large Vessel Occlusion Using Artificial Neural Network. (Front Aging Neurosci, 2018)
- Optimal Transport Destination for Ischemic Stroke Patients With Unknown Vessel Status: Use of Prehospital Triage Scores. (Stroke, 2017)