Infrequent exposure to prehospital neonatal interventions and resource utilisation by a public EMS in the Western Cape, South Africa.
BMC Emergency Medicine · 2026-07-27 · Registry study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The neonatal period is the most vulnerable time of every child's life, with approximately 6,300 neonatal deaths occurring globally every day. Emergency medical services (EMS) are responsible for managing critically ill neonates during emergency response and interfacility transfers (IFTs), however, prehospital provider proficiency is challenged by low-frequency exposure rates. Understanding the emergency care utilisation and associated clinical interventions among this vulnerable population can inform future research and, ultimately, paramedicine training needs, strategic service planning, and system development. METHODS: A retrospective review of electronic patient care records was conducted for neonates < 28 days old managed by the Western Cape public EMS in South Africa between 01 January 2022 and 31 December 2023. Electronic records were analysed for demographic, clinical presentations, and prehospital interventions using descriptive statistics, following STROBE reporting guidelines. RESULTS: Neonatal activations (n = 9,825) accounted for 0.7% of EMS activations during the study period, with interventions performed infrequently across the cohort, particularly high-risk procedures such as prehospital intubation (0.4%). Specialised retrieval teams (SRTs) managed a preponderance of high-acuity neonates requiring IFT relative to their caseload and were strongly associated with increased administration of advanced interventions. Non-SRT crews attended the majority of high acuity cases (3,206; 65.4%), despite being predominantly staffed by lower-qualified practitioners with limited neonatal scope of practice. The recorded incidence of mechanical ventilation (n = 451, 4.6%) was significantly higher than that of sedation/analgesia (n = 105, 1.1%). CONCLUSION: This study analysed the interventions and resources utilised by a public EMS to stabilise and transport neonates in a low-resource setting. Key findings included infrequent exposure to neonates, limited reporting of sedation and analgesia in mechanically ventilated patients, and the prevalence of specialised retrieval teams in managing high-acuity IFTs in this patient population.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Mechanical ventilation · Critical care & advanced paramedics · Endotracheal intubation · Neonates · Interfacility & critical care transport · Low- and middle-income settings
Related articles
- The neonatal transfer process through the lens of neonatologists at public hospitals in South Africa. (Health SA, 2022)
- The development of a consensus-based curriculum for a Bespoke Online Neonatal Education for Transfers (BONNETs) course. (BMC Med Educ, 2026)
- Use of the Duotron transporter high frequency ventilator during neonatal transport. (Neonatal Netw, 2007)
- Neonatal transport practices and effectiveness of the use of low-cost interventions on outcomes of transported neonates in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. (Health Sci Rep, 2024)
- Service utilisation and outcomes of transfers by a specialised paediatric and neonatal retrieval service in the Western Cape, South Africa. (Afr J Emerg Med, 2025)
- Towards a Safer and More Efficient Neonatal Transfer System in South Africa: A Qualitative Inquiry with Advanced Life Support Paramedics (Paramedicine, 2021)