Systems mapping for technology development in CBRN response
International Journal of Emergency Services · 2018-04-12 · Qualitative study
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop an EU sociotechnical systems (STSs) map to represent a harmonised concept of operations (CONOPS) as a future development platform for technologies used in multi-services emergency responses to chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) incidents. Design/methodology/approach AcciMaps were developed to locate where technologies are currently used, and opportunities for new technologies. The AcciMaps were iteratively co-designed with end users (fire, ambulance, police and military) across three EU countries (the UK, Finland and Greece). Data were collected using document analysis and interviews with senior ranking (Gold or Silver Command level) representatives of the participating end users. Findings Despite differences in terminology and between service sectors, consensus was achieved for the command structures (Gold, Silver and Bronze), and Hot Zone responders (specialist blue light responders and blue light responders (BLR)). A control room was included as the communication spine. BLR activities were limited by their scope of practice and available equipment, for example, breathing apparatus. The harmonised EU AcciMap offers a high-level STSs map of CBRN response. Critical segments have been identified which offer opportunities for technology developments that can add value in terms of response capabilities (e.g. tag and trace). Originality/value A large scale major CBRN incident may need cross-border and cross-professional engagement where efficient interoperability is vital. This research is the first EU consensus of a STS map for CONOPS. It supports future research for technology development, e.g., detection and decontamination equipment design and use, communication, diagnosis and response technologies.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via OpenAlex. Reuse and removal
Tags
Communication & handover · Interagency collaboration · Military & tactical · Fire service & police
Related articles
- The chemical disaster response system in Japan. (Prehosp Disaster Med, 2003)
- Civilian Medical Responder Perspectives to a Federal Military Medical Deployment in New York City during the COVID-19 Pandemic. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2024)
- Medical management of toxicological mass casualty events. (Isr Med Assoc J, 2008)
- Disaster Report - Petroleum Depot (HAZMAT) Fire and Mass-Casualty Event in Guinea-December 18, 2023. (Prehosp Disaster Med, 2025)
- Analysis of Military-Civilian Patient Handoff at Vista Forge Multi-Agency Nuclear Disaster Exercise 2022. (Mil Med, 2024)
- The poison center role in biological and chemical terrorism. (Vet Hum Toxicol, 2000)