Soiled Airway Tracheal Intubation and the Effectiveness of Decontamination by United Kingdom Paramedics (Satiated2): A Randomised Controlled Manikin Study
Paramedicine · 2020-01-01 · Randomised trial
Abstract
Introduction Vomiting and regurgitation are commonly encountered in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, but traditional paramedic suctioning techniques may be insufficient to manage severely soiled airways. The Suction Assisted Laryngoscopy and Airway Decontamination (SALAD) technique was developed to help clinicians manage soiled airways. SATIATED2 reports the impact of SALAD training in North East Ambulance Service (NEAS) in the United Kingdom following the original SATIATED study in the Yorkshire Ambulance Service. The primary research question was: Among NEAS paramedics, does the addition of SALAD training, compared to standard training, improve the success rate of intubation for the soiled airway? Methods A randomised controlled trial of SALAD was conducted using a modified airway manikin capable of vomiting. The intervention comprised SALAD training and the introduction of the DuCanto catheter. Paramedic volunteers were block randomised into two groups: A 01 A 02 B 01 who made two pre-training intubation attempts and one post-training attempt, and A 11 B 11 B 12 , who made one pre-training and two post-training attempts. The primary outcome was intubation success rate at the second attempt. The time taken to intubate was recorded as a secondary outcome. SATIATED2 was registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN17329526) and funded internally with commercial support from SSCOR who supplied the DuCanto catheters. Results One-hundred and two paramedics (51 AAB, 51 ABB) were recruited between August and December 2019 with 99 participating (50 AAB, 49 ABB). The primary outcome was intubation success rate on the second attempt (A 02 vs. B 11 ) which were 86% without SALAD and 96% with SALAD; a non-significant improvement of 10% (95% CI: 1–21, p=0.09). The total intubation success rate pre-training (A 01 +A 02 +A 11 ) was 75% (112/149) compared with 98% (145/148) post-training (B 01 +B 11 +B 12 ). Conclusion NEAS paramedics demonstrated improved, but non-significant, intubation success rates in a simulated soiled airway following SALAD training.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via OpenAlex. Reuse and removal
Tags
Endotracheal intubation · Paramedics & EMTs · Suction
Related articles
- Comparison of video and conventional laryngoscopes for simulated difficult emergency tracheal intubations in the presence of liquids in the airway. (PLoS One, 2019)
- A comparison of the suction laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in emergency medical technicians: a manikin model of severe airway haemorrhage. (Emerg Med J, 2012)
- Effectiveness of using suction assisted laryngoscopy airway decontamination technique to assist endotracheal intubation with En.An‐II P Video Laryngoscopy® by paramedics in a manikin simulating massive hematemesis: A randomized, crossover, manikin study (Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2026)
- Effect of SALAD Technique on CPR Quality During Intubation in Contaminated Airways: A Randomized Controlled Manikin Simulation Study. (Emerg Med Int, 2025)
- Soiled airway tracheal intubation and the effectiveness of decontamination by paramedics (SATIATED): a randomised controlled manikin study. (Br Paramed J, 2019)
- Effect of Suction Assisted Laryngoscopy Airway Decontamination (SALAD) Training on Intubation Quality Metrics. (Air Med J, 2019)