Descriptive before-and-after study of the introduction of a ‘Leave Behind’ take-home naloxone dispensing/distribution program by the ambulance service in Western Australia
Paramedicine · 2024-01-15 · Quasi-experimental
Abstract
Objective To describe changes observed in case characteristics and patient outcomes before and after ambulance service participation in a ‘Leave Behind’ take-home naloxone (THN) dispensing/distribution program. Methods This before-and-after study included emergency ambulance attendances for patients experiencing an opioid overdose one year before 1 October 2021 (pre-participation phase: 1 October 2020–30 September 2021) when St John Western Australia (SJWA) participated in the THN program and those one year after the date (post-participation phase: 1 October 2021–30 September 2022). Results There were 945 and 1240 opioid overdoses among 221,451 and 222,480 emergency ambulance attendances in the pre- and post-participation phases (0.43% vs 0.56%, p < 0.001). The number of ambulance attendances for overdose in the post-participation phase was not significantly different from that predicted based on the ambulance attendances in the pre-participation phase. No statistically significant differences in patient age, sex, and geographical location were identified between the two phases. Compared to the pre-participation phase, more patients had naloxone administered prior to ambulance arrival (10.7% vs 15.1%, p = 0.003), and more patients were discharged at the scene (21.2% vs 29.8%, p < 0.001) in the post-participation phase. No difference was found in mortality within one day (3.4% in the pre-participation phase vs 3.5% in the post-participation phase, p = 0.30). Conclusions After implementation of a ‘Leave Behind’ take-home naloxone dispensing/distribution program, more patients had naloxone administered prior to ambulance arrival, and the likelihood of discharging a patient at the scene significantly increased without affecting patient survival rates.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via OpenAlex. Reuse and removal
Tags
Antidotes · Implementation · Mortality & survival · Naloxone
Related articles
- At-risk patient documentation and naloxone dispersal for a rural statewide EMS "Naloxone Leave Behind" program. (J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open, 2024)
- Trends and characteristics during 17 years of naloxone distribution and administration through an overdose prevention program in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. (PLoS One, 2025)
- Opioid overdose rates and implementation of overdose education and nasal naloxone distribution in Massachusetts: interrupted time series analysis. (BMJ, 2013)
- A systematic review of the distribution of take-home naloxone in low- and middle-income countries and barriers to the implementation of take-home naloxone programs. (Harm Reduct J, 2022)
- Are take-home naloxone programmes effective? Systematic review utilizing application of the Bradford Hill criteria. (Addiction, 2016)
- Assessment of a County-Wide, Pan-First Responder Take-Home Naloxone Program in Denver, Colorado. (J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open, 2026)