Research agenda and priorities for Australian and New Zealand paramedicine: A Delphi consensus study
Paramedicine · 2024-02-20 · Method & validation
Abstract
Introduction: The systematic development of a research agenda is essential for coordinated, collaborative, and efficient research endeavours in any discipline. The aim of this study was to create and prioritise a stakeholder-informed, consensus-derived paramedicine research agenda for Australia and New Zealand. Methods: The study utilised a modified Delphi consensus method consisting of three phases. Phase 1, the findings of which were previously published, consisted of a survey of Australian and New Zealand paramedicine stakeholders to inform the subsequent consensus process. Phase 2 contained three Delphi rounds involving key paramedicine profession stakeholders to generate a research agenda. Panellists were asked to rate their agreement with the inclusion of each item using a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as 80% agreement signalled by ‘ Strongly Agree’ and ‘ Agree’ responses. Phase 3 involved one additional round of voting to determine the importance and thus establish priorities amongst the final list of agenda items. Results: There were 341 responses to the survey in Phase 1 and thematic analysis produced a provisional agenda consisting of 109 perceived research priorities. Sixty-three key paramedicine profession stakeholders were invited to Phases 2 and 3, of which 56 (88.9%) completed all three rounds in Phase 2, and 43 (68.3%) completed the final Phase 3. Thirty-seven items achieved consensus and were subsequently prioritised constituting the final research agenda. Panellists gave the highest priority to ‘Paramedics role in broader healthcare system’, ‘New and emerging roles in for paramedics’, ‘Patient safety’, ‘System improvement’, and ‘Clinical reasoning processes and models’. Conclusion: Using a modified Delphi consensus method and drawing from a broad range of stakeholders, a 37-item Australian and New Zealand paramedicine research agenda with item prioritisation was developed. The agenda serves to inform industry and other key stakeholders to guide their research endeavours ultimately leading to meaningful and tangible impact within the paramedicine profession.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via OpenAlex. Reuse and removal
Tags
Paramedics & EMTs · Research methods & trial conduct
Related articles
- Barriers and enablers to paramedicine research in Australasia – A cross-sectional survey (Paramedicine, 2023)
- Building an Australasian paramedicine research agenda: a narrative review. (Health Res Policy Syst, 2015)
- Paramedic clinical decision making during high acuity emergency calls: design and methodology of a Delphi study. (BMC Emerg Med, 2009)
- Impact of the First Swiss Conference on Prehospital Emergency Care and Trauma Research (SPECTRe) on Paramedics' Intention to Engage in Research: Cross-sectional Study. (J Emerg Med, 2025)
- EMS Provider Attitudes and Perceptions of Enrolling Patients without Consent in Prehospital Emergency Research. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2016)
- Paramedics as Researchers: A Systematic Review of Paramedic Perspectives of Engaging in Research Activity From Training to Practice. (J Emerg Med, 2024)