THE PRE-HOSPITAL EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICES ADHERENCE FOR ACUTE CARDIOGENIC PULMONARY EDEMA TREATMENT PROTOCOLS
Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal · 2024-06-14 · Observational study
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema (ACPE) has been the subject of Prehospital Emergency Health Services (PHEMS) for many years and is included in treatment protocols. Although these protocols were created from current literature information with proven accuracy, the rapid developments in the medical literature can sometimes take time to reflect on protocols and some differences may occur between the literature discussions and protocols. This study aimed to examine the differences between PHEMS protocols and current literature discussions in ACPE and the effects of these differences on PHEMS personnel. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present study, which was planned in descriptive type, consisted of two stages. In the first stage, the PHEMS protocols were examined worldwide, and seven protocols, which included the ACPE treatment protocols, were evaluated. In the second stage, questions were asked to the participants, including current information about the treatment of ACPE, and whether they followed up-to-date literature information. Participants were asked to answer the questions with their up-to-date knowledge regardless of the PHEMS protocols they were responsible for. The sample consisted of 600 participants and the data were collected between February and April 2022. RESULTS: It was observed that Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) application was included in all the protocols evaluated, that there were differences in nitrate usage dose and furosemide application, and that aggressive nitrate application was not included in any of the protocols. In this study, 67.2% of the participants stated that they followed up-to-date information about their profession; 32.7% would prefer the use of aggressive nitrate in SPD, 33.8% would apply furosemide if the patient did not feel relief after nitrate use, 29.7% would apply morphine sulfate, and 70.5% would apply CPAP if there were an indication. CONCLUSIONS: The differences between the PHEMS protocols and the current literature on the treatment of ACPE may cause confusion among PHEMS personnel. Further studies are needed to clarify protocols for the aggressive use of nitrates and furosemide. In the case of morphine sulfate use, limitations and side effects should be stated more clearly.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via OpenAlex. Reuse and removal
Tags
Analgesics · Cardiovascular drugs · CPAP & NIV · Furosemide · Morphine
Related articles
- [How I treat…the cardiogenic acute pulmonary oedema]. (Rev Med Liege, 2024)
- Effectiveness of prehospital continuous positive airway pressure in the management of acute pulmonary edema. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2006)
- High-dose intravenous isosorbide-dinitrate is safer and better than Bi-PAP ventilation combined with conventional treatment for severe pulmonary edema. (J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000)
- Prehospital management of congestive heart failure. (Heart Fail Clin, 2009)
- Prehospital therapy for acute congestive heart failure: state of the art. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2003)
- Do medications affect vital signs in the prehospital treatment of acute decompensated heart failure? (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2006)