Investigating the effects of under-triage by existing major incident triage tools.
European Journal of Emergency Medicine · 2017-11-10 · Observational study
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Triage is a key principle in the effective management of a major incident. Its effectiveness is a balance between identifying those in need of life-saving intervention, and those triaged incorrectly as either needing/not needing a life-saving intervention. The primary aim of this study was to report mortality in those under-triaged by existing major incident triage tools. Secondary aims were to report the ability of triage tools at identifying serious injury by body region (defined as an Abbreviated Injury Scale severity score≥3). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective database analysis of the UK Trauma Audit Research Network for all adult patients (≥18 years) between 2006 and 2014. Patients were defined as priority one using a previously published list. Using the first recorded hospital physiology, patients were categorized by the Modified Physiological Triage Tool (MPTT), National Ambulance Resilience Unit (NARU) Sieve and the Major Incident Medical Management and Support (MIMMS) Triage Sieve. Categorical and continuous data were analyzed using a χ-test and Mann-Whitney U-test respectively. RESULTS: During the study period, 218 985 adult patients met the Trauma Audit Research Network inclusion criteria, with 24 791 (19.5%) priority one patients, of which 70% were male with a median age of 51 (33-71) years and injury severity score of 16 (9-25). The MPTT showed the lowest rate of under-triage (42.4%, P<0.001). Compared with existing methods, the MPTT under-triage population had significantly lower mortality (5.7%, P<0.001) with significantly fewer serious thorax and head injuries under-triaged than both the NARU Sieve and MIMMS Triage Sieve (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study has defined the implications of under-triage in the context of a major trauma population. The MPTT misses fewer severely injured patients, with a significant reduction in mortality. We suggest the MPTT to be considered as an alternative to existing primary major incident triage tools.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Mass casualty triage · Mortality & survival · Triage instruments
Related articles
- Accuracy of National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) in Prehospital Triage on In-Hospital Early Mortality: A Multi-Center Observational Prospective Cohort Study. (Prehosp Disaster Med, 2019)
- Prehospital Disaster Triage Does Not Predict Pediatric Outcomes: Comparing the Criteria Outcomes Tool to Three Mass-Casualty Incident Triage Algorithms. (Prehosp Disaster Med, 2021)
- Emergency service experience following the terrorist attack in Mogadishu, 14 October 2017, a scene of lay rescuer triage. (Am J Emerg Med, 2021)
- Comparative analysis of major incident triage tools in children: a UK population-based analysis. (Emerg Med J, 2021)
- Effect of the 2011 Revisions to the Field Triage Guidelines on Under- and Over-Triage Rates for Pediatric Trauma Patients. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2017)
- Is a maximum Revised Trauma Score a safe triage tool for Helicopter Emergency Medical Services cancellations? (Eur J Emerg Med, 2011)