Development of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) networks delivering early defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) in areas lacking timely access to emergency medical services (EMS) in Germany: a comparative economic study.
BMJ Open · 2021-01-22 · Observational study
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study wants to assess the cost-effectiveness of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) equipped with automated external defibrillators (AED) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). Especially in rural areas with longer response times of emergency medical services (EMS) early lay defibrillation could lead to a significant higher survival in OHCA. PARTICIPANTS: 3296 emergency medical stations in Germany. SETTING: Rural areas in Germany. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Three UAV networks providing 80%, 90% or 100% coverage for rural areas lacking timely access to EMS (ie, time-to-defibrillation: >10 min) were developed using a location allocation analysis. For each UAV network, primary outcome was the cost-effectiveness using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculated by the ratio of financial costs to additional life years gained compared with current EMS. RESULTS: Current EMS with 3926 emergency stations was able to gain 1224 life years on annual average in the study area. The UAV network providing 100% coverage consisted of 1933 UAV with average annual costs of €43.5 million and 1845 additional life years gained on annual average (ICER: €23 568). The UAV network providing 90% coverage consisted of 1074 UAV with average annual costs of €24.2 million and 1661 additional life years gained on annual average (ICER: €14 548). The UAV network providing 80% coverage consisted of 798 UAV with average annual costs of €18.0 million and 1477 additional life years gained on annual average (ICER: €12 158). CONCLUSION: These results reveal the relevant life-saving potential of all modelled UAV networks. Furthermore, all analysed UAV networks could be deemed cost-effective. However, real-life applications are needed to validate the findings.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Automated external defibrillator · Cost & cost-effectiveness · Drones · Rural & remote
Related articles
- Can drones save lives and money? An economic evaluation of airborne delivery of automated external defibrillators. (Eur J Health Econ, 2023)
- Cost-effectiveness of a national public access defibrillation programme. (Resuscitation, 2015)
- Improving Community Survival Rates from Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. (Curr Cardiol Rev, 2018)
- Barriers and enablers to public access defibrillation - an international RAND-UCLA consensus study. (Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2026)
- Deployment, dispatch, and delivery: a scoping review of drone-delivered AED for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. (Front Public Health, 2026)
- Economic evaluation of automated external defibrillator deployment in public settings for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review. (Expert Rev Med Devices, 2024)