Inhaled analgesics for the treatment of prehospital acute pain-A systematic review.
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2024-09-26 · Systematic review
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many prehospital emergency patients receive suboptimal treatment for their moderate to severe pain. Various factors may contribute. We aim to systematically review literature pertaining to prehospital emergency adult patients with acute pain and the pain-reducing effects, adverse events (AEs), and safety issues associated with inhaled analgetic agents compared with other prehospital analgesic agents. METHODS: As part of an initiative from the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, we conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42018114399), applying the PRISMA guidelines, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE), and Cochrane methods, searching the Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, PubMed, and EMBASE databases (updated March 2024). Inclusion criteria were the use of inhaled analgesic agents in adult patients with acute pain in the prehospital emergency care setting. All steps were performed by minimum of two individual researchers. The primary outcome was pain reduction; secondary outcomes were speed of onset, duration of effect, and relevant AEs. RESULTS: We included seven studies (56,535 patients in total) that compared inhaled agents (methoxyflurane [MF] and nitrous oxide [N2O]) to other drugs or placebo. Study designs were randomized controlled trial (1; n = 60), randomized non-blinded study (1; n = 343), and randomized open-label study (1; n = 270). The remaining were prospective or retrospective observational studies. The evidence according to GRADE was of low or very low quality. No combined meta-analysis was possible. N2O may reduce pain compared to placebo, but not compared to intravenous (IV) paracetamol, and may be less effective compared to morphine and MF. MF may reduce pain compared to paracetamol, ketoprofen, tramadol, and fentanyl. Both agents may be associated with marked but primarily mild AEs. CONCLUSION: We found low-quality evidence suggesting that both MF and N2O are safe and may have a role in the management of pain in the prehospital setting. There is low-quality evidence to support MF as a short-acting single analgesic or as a bridge to IV access and the administration of other analgesics. There may be occupational health issues regarding the prehospital use of N2O.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Analgesics · Fentanyl · Methoxyflurane · Morphine · Nitrous oxide · Paracetamol
Related articles
- Pain management of adults in the prehospital setting: a scoping review. (BMC Emerg Med, 2026)
- Evidence-Based Guidelines for Prehospital Pain Management: Recommendations. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2023)
- Clinical effectiveness and costs of pre-hospital inhaled methoxyflurane for acute pain in trauma in adults: non-randomised control group study. (Br Paramed J, 2021)
- Prehospital Analgesia for Pediatric Trauma Patients in Iraq and Afghanistan. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2018)
- Variability of Prehospital Pain Management Protocols: A Review of Prehospital Care Protocols in the United States. (Open Access Emerg Med, 2024)
- Evaluation of the effectiveness and costs of inhaled methoxyflurane versus usual analgesia for prehospital injury and trauma: non-randomised clinical study. (BMC Emerg Med, 2022)