The Evaluation and Management of Patients With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior by Emergency Medical Services.
Crisis · 2026-10-09 · Implementation & quality improvement
Abstract
Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians, such as paramedics and emergency medical technicians, frequently respond to 911 calls involving patients with suicidal ideation or behavior (SIB); however, guidance for these complex prehospital encounters remains limited. This article describes the Los Angeles County EMS Agency's (LAC-EMSA) initiative to develop a comprehensive policy for evaluating and managing patients with SIB. A quality improvement (QI) committee approach was used to assess current practices, identify targets for improvement, design countermeasures, and implement policy changes. Key activities included reviewing national model guidelines and California's EMS agencies' policies; conducting interdisciplinary case reviews of EMS encounters with patients with SIB; surveying emergency departments on suicide screening practices; collecting EMS clinicians' perspectives on challenges and potential interventions; and evaluating commonly used suicide risk screening instruments. Findings were synthesized through committee discussions, identifying five critical domains for improvement: (1) standardized terminology; (2) evidence-based guidance for evaluating suicide risk; (3) enhanced decision support for patient disposition; (4) protocols for safety planning; and (5) strategies for collaboration with law enforcement and conflict resolution. The committee recommended a new comprehensive policy addressing these domains which was subsequently developed and implemented. Limitations include the initiative's focus on a single county EMS system, the absence of validated prehospital suicide risk screening tools, and the need for evaluation of the policy's effectiveness. This initiative demonstrates that EMS agencies can leverage QI methodologies to create evidence-informed policies that advance prehospital care for SIB and reduce variability in practice.
Abstract © the authors or publisher, via PubMed. Reuse and removal
Tags
Interagency collaboration · Implementation · Decision support tools
Related articles
- Managing Mental Health Crisis Calls Received by a US Poison Center: A Statewide Collaboration Between the Georgia Poison Center, 911, and 988. (Am J Public Health, 2025)
- Systems thinking methods: a worked example of supporting emergency medical services decision-makers to prioritize and contextually analyse potential interventions and their implementation. (Health Res Policy Syst, 2023)
- Emergency healthcare process automation using mobile computing and cloud services. (J Med Syst, 2012)
- Advancing Emergency Medical Services' (EMS) Response Capability for Behavioral Health Emergencies: Los Angeles County's Performance Improvement Initiative. (Prehosp Emerg Care, 2024)
- [A monitor for the emergency psychiatric service chain]. (Tijdschr Psychiatr, 2014)
- Deflecting Suicide Calls From Law Enforcement With an Embedded Crisis Line Specialist at a 911 Center: A Synthetic Control Analysis. (Community Ment Health J, 2026)